Ad is loading...
DESCX vs RWEBX
DESCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts DESCX vs RWEBX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.92 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.95B
DESCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DESCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DESCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 179B vs. DESCX (205M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than DESCX: RWEBX (0.83) vs DESCX (0.00). DESCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: DESCX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). DESCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. DESCX (9.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DESCX: RWEBX (250) vs DESCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.52 vs. DESCX (-6.80). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.55 vs. DESCX (48.33).
| DESCX | RWEBX | DESCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.06 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.06 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.781 | -2.167 | 590% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205M | 179B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.80 | 0.52 | -1,316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.53 | 7.34 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.33 | 51.55 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.35 | 49.16 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...