DFAE
Price
$38.23
Change
-$0.64 (-1.65%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
9.44B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VWO
Price
$57.72
Change
-$0.73 (-1.25%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
162.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DFAE vs VWO

Header iconDFAE vs VWO Comparison
Open Charts DFAE vs VWOBanner chart's image
DFAE vs VWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) vs. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)

Key Takeaways

  • DFAE employs a systematic active strategy with tilts toward profitability and value factors, offering broader diversification with over 6,300 holdings compared to VWO's approximately 5,000.
  • VWO is a low-cost passive ETF tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index (ER: 0.06%), while DFAE has a higher expense ratio of 0.29% but targets enhanced risk-adjusted returns.
  • Both ETFs exhibit heavy exposure to technology (DFAE ~35%, VWO ~26%) and financial services (~17-21%), with Taiwan Semiconductor as the top holding in both.
  • DFAE's factor-based approach may provide relative outperformance in certain market cycles, particularly favoring small-cap and profitable emerging market firms.
  • VWO offers superior cost efficiency and liquidity, making it suitable for long-term buy-and-hold investors seeking benchmark-like exposure.
  • Structural differences highlight DFAE's potential for higher volatility due to active tilts versus VWO's market-cap weighted stability.

Introduction

DFAE and VWO represent compelling options for investors seeking exposure to emerging markets equities, a asset class offering growth potential amid shifting global dynamics. While both target companies in developing economies like Taiwan, China, India, and South Korea, they differ in strategy: VWO provides straightforward index replication, while DFAE incorporates factor tilts for potential alpha. This ETF comparison examines their structural differences, exposure profiles, and positioning amid macroeconomic trends such as interest rate normalization, supply chain diversification, and geopolitical tensions. Investors weighing sector exposure and fund performance can use these insights to align with portfolio goals in the current market environment.

Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) Overview

The Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) is a systematically managed active ETF designed to achieve long-term capital appreciation by investing in emerging markets equities. It emphasizes factors like profitability, value, and smaller company sizes within a broad market framework, rather than strictly tracking a traditional index. With approximately 6,300 holdings, DFAE provides extensive diversification across large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks.

Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (~12.5%), Samsung Electronics (~5%), SK Hynix (~4.3%), and Tencent (~2.5%). Sector allocations feature technology at around 35%, financial services at 17%, industrials at 10%, and basic materials at 8%. The expense ratio is 0.29%, reflecting its research-driven approach. DFAE rebalances periodically to maintain factor exposures, distinguishing it from passive peers through its focus on durable characteristics for risk-adjusted returns.

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, a market-cap weighted benchmark covering large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from over 20 emerging economies. It holds around 5,000 securities, delivering broad exposure with high liquidity.

Key top holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (~12.8%), Tencent Holdings (~3.6%), Alibaba Group (~2.6%), and Reliance Industries (~0.9%). Sector breakdown includes technology (~26%), financial services (~21%), consumer cyclical (~11%), and basic materials (~8%). With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.06%, VWO employs index sampling and quarterly rebalancing to mirror the benchmark efficiently. Its structure prioritizes cost minimization and reliable tracking for core emerging markets allocation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets face a complex environment shaped by U.S. interest rate paths, China's economic recovery, and commodity price swings. Technology and semiconductors drive growth, fueled by AI demand and supply chain shifts away from concentrated risks. Financial services benefit from rising middle-class consumption in India and Southeast Asia, while geopolitical tensions in Taiwan Strait and U.S.-China trade frictions add volatility. Capital flows favor diversified EM exposure amid U.S. dollar strength, with regulatory changes in China impacting tech giants. Sector risks include policy shifts and currency depreciation, but macroeconomic tailwinds like infrastructure spending and energy transitions support long-term positioning.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, DFAE has shown stronger relative positioning, benefiting from its factor tilts toward profitable tech firms like Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) and SK Hynix during semiconductor rallies. Over the past year, DFAE has outperformed VWO, linking to sector rotation into technology and industrials amid AI-driven demand. VWO, true to its benchmark, exhibits lower volatility due to market-cap weighting, performing steadily in broad EM uptrends but lagging in factor-favorable environments. Volatility differences stem from DFAE's small-cap emphasis versus VWO's large-cap bias, with both sensitive to interest rate expectations and commodity trends. Relative strength in recent weeks underscores DFAE's adaptability amid U.S. rate cut anticipation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like emerging markets ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors DFAE due to its structural advantages in diversification, factor-driven trend consistency, and stronger relative performance in recent cycles driven by technology momentum. While VWO excels in cost efficiency, DFAE's broader holdings and profitability tilt offer a probabilistic edge in the prevailing environment of sector rotation and growth tailwinds, though with moderately higher risk exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DFAE vs. VWO commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAE is a Hold and VWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWO has more net assets: 163B vs. DFAE (9.44B). DFAE has a higher annual dividend yield than VWO: DFAE (17.683) vs VWO (8.724). DFAE was incepted earlier than VWO: DFAE (6 years) vs VWO (21 years). VWO (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than DFAE (0.29). DFAE (6.00) and VWO (6.00) have matching turnover.
DFAEVWODFAE / VWO
Gain YTD17.6838.724203%
Net Assets9.44B163B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.290.06483%
Turnover6.006.00100%
Yield1.762.4373%
Fund Existence6 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFAEVWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DFAE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMST50.930.01
+0.02%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
TUSI25.33N/A
+0.02%
Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF
SPD40.74-0.13
-0.31%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF
CGRO21.82-0.12
-0.55%
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Gr ETF
AGIX44.53-0.89
-1.96%
KraneSharesArtfclIntglcandTechPub-PvtETF

DFAE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAE has been closely correlated with KC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAE jumps, then KC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DFAE
1D Price
Change %
DFAE100%
-1.54%
KC - DFAE
67%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
BZUN - DFAE
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
BSAC - DFAE
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
GDS - DFAE
60%
Loosely correlated
-7.31%
FUTU - DFAE
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
More

VWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWO has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VWO jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VWO
1D Price
Change %
VWO100%
+0.21%
JD - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
BILI - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
BIDU - VWO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
BABA - VWO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
BZ - VWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More