Ad is loading...
DFAT vs SQLV
DFAT vs SQLV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SQLV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$54.95
Change-$0.30 (-0.54%)
Volume$1.64K
CapitalizationN/A
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
Price$41.45
Change-$0.17 (-0.41%)
Volume$120
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs SQLV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
DFAT vs. SQLV commentary
Oct 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a StrongBuy and SQLV is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.6B vs. SQLV (29.2M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SQLV: DFAT (6.623) vs SQLV (1.953). DFAT was incepted earlier than SQLV: DFAT (26 years) vs SQLV (7 years). SQLV has a higher turnover DFAT (3.00) vs DFAT (3.00).
| DFAT | SQLV | DFAT / SQLV | |
| Gain YTD | 6.623 | 1.953 | 339% |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 29.2M | 36,301% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 51.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SQLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SQLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQLV has been closely correlated with IBOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQLV jumps, then IBOC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQLV | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| IBOC - SQLV | 81% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| WSFS - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| ABCB - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| WAFD - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -6.14% | ||
| PFC - SQLV | 78% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||