Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$34.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.39B
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$54.64
Change+$0.32 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets776.81M
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. HWSCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and HWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. HWSCX (777M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than HWSCX: DFFVX (1.63) vs HWSCX (0.72). DFFVX was incepted earlier than HWSCX: DFFVX (25 years) vs HWSCX (23 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSCX: DFFVX (0) vs HWSCX (2500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. HWSCX (-4.16). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 116.56 vs. HWSCX (84.28).
| DFFVX | HWSCX | DFFVX / HWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.331 | 0.238 | 977% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 777M | 1,725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.72 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | -4.16 | -284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 3.96 | 948% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.56 | 84.28 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.84 | 5.26 | 1,194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement