Ad is loading...
DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$28.56
Change-$1.46 (-4.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$44.70
Change-$2.53 (-5.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.41M
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. HWSCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Hold and HWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. HWSCX (710M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than HWSCX: DFFVX (1.63) vs HWSCX (0.74). DFFVX was incepted earlier than HWSCX: DFFVX (25 years) vs HWSCX (23 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSCX: DFFVX (0) vs HWSCX (2500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.04 vs. HWSCX (-19.73). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 92.99 vs. HWSCX (75.15).
| DFFVX | HWSCX | DFFVX / HWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.540 | -13.355 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 710M | 1,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.74 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.04 | -19.73 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.59 | -20.78 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.99 | 75.15 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.48 | -11.27 | -270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers