Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$31.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.36B
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$49.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.31M
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. HWSCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and HWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. HWSCX (699M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than HWSCX: DFFVX (1.71) vs HWSCX (0.79). DFFVX was incepted earlier than HWSCX: DFFVX (25 years) vs HWSCX (23 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSCX: DFFVX (0) vs HWSCX (2500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.47 vs. HWSCX (-16.09). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 108.13 vs. HWSCX (79.42).
| DFFVX | HWSCX | DFFVX / HWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.95 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.926 | -9.521 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 699M | 1,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 0.79 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.47 | -16.09 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.12 | -13.71 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.13 | 79.42 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.83 | -8.52 | -526% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers