Ad is loading...
DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$36.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$63.50
Change-$0.21 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
DFFVX vs. HWSCX commentary
Nov 09, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and HWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. HWSCX (878M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than HWSCX: DFFVX (1.37) vs HWSCX (0.41). DFFVX was incepted earlier than HWSCX: DFFVX (25 years) vs HWSCX (23 years). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (20.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSCX: DFFVX (0) vs HWSCX (2500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.42 vs. HWSCX (25.26). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 63.22 vs. HWSCX (45.19).
| DFFVX | HWSCX | DFFVX / HWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.355 | 10.512 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 878M | 1,640% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.41 | 334% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.42 | 25.26 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.11 | 5.91 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.22 | 45.19 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.60 | 11.07 | 584% |