Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs LRSFX
DFFVX vs LRSFX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs LRSFX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$34.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.39B
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets379.49M
DFFVX vs LRSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. LRSFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and LRSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. LRSFX (379M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: DFFVX (1.63) vs LRSFX (0.17). DFFVX was incepted earlier than LRSFX: DFFVX (25 years) vs LRSFX (18 years). LRSFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX (0) and LRSFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. LRSFX (-2.46). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 116.56 vs. LRSFX (33.27).
| DFFVX | LRSFX | DFFVX / LRSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.06 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.331 | -1.289 | -181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 379M | 3,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.17 | 979% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | -2.46 | -479% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | 22.58 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.56 | 33.27 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.84 | -43.46 | -145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers