Ad is loading...
DFIV vs RODE
DFIV vs RODE Comparison
Open Charts DFIV vs RODE
Dimensional International Value ETF
Price$35.49
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Multifactor Divers Intl ETF
Price$27.67
Change-$0.36 (-1.28%)
Volume$1.64K
CapitalizationN/A
DFIV vs RODE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFIV vs. RODE commentary
Dec 29, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFIV is a Buy and RODE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFIV has more net assets: 8.08B vs. RODE (17.9M). RODE has a higher annual dividend yield than DFIV: RODE (8.937) vs DFIV (7.288). DFIV was incepted earlier than RODE: DFIV (26 years) vs RODE (8 years). RODE has a higher turnover DFIV (12.00) vs DFIV (12.00).
| DFIV | RODE | DFIV / RODE | |
| Gain YTD | 7.288 | 8.937 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 8.08B | 17.9M | 45,162% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 58.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 3.53 | 4.98 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFIV | RODE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 26 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFIV has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFIV jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFIV | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| SLF - DFIV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| PBA - DFIV | 70% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| BN - DFIV | 70% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| BNS - DFIV | 68% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MFC - DFIV | 67% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
RODE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODE has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RODE jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODE | 100% | N/A | ||
| WDS - RODE | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SHEL - RODE | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ML - RODE | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AC - RODE | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| SAN - RODE | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||