Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFNL vs KCE
DFNL vs KCE Comparison
Open Charts DFNL vs KCE
Davis Select Financial ETF
Price$43.65
Change-$0.30 (-0.68%)
Volume$8.32K
Net Assets304.17M
SPDR® S&P Capital Markets ETF
Price$154.68
Change-$0.84 (-0.54%)
Volume$17.64K
Net Assets551.85M
DFNL vs KCE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFNL vs. KCE commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFNL is a Hold and KCE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KCE has more net assets: 552M vs. DFNL (304M). DFNL has a higher annual dividend yield than KCE: DFNL (14.586) vs KCE (13.331). DFNL was incepted earlier than KCE: DFNL (9 years) vs KCE (20 years). KCE (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than DFNL (0.63). KCE has a higher turnover DFNL (1.00) vs DFNL (1.00).
| DFNL | KCE | DFNL / KCE | |
| Gain YTD | 14.586 | 13.331 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 304M | 552M | 55% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.35 | 180% |
| Turnover | 1.00 | 23.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 1.60 | 1.56 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFNL | KCE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 75% | 21 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFNL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFNL has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFNL jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFNL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFNL | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| TFC - DFNL | 88% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| NTB - DFNL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| RNR - DFNL | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| COF - DFNL | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| WFC - DFNL | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||
KCE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KCE has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KCE jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KCE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCE | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| PIPR - KCE | 89% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| JHG - KCE | 89% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| JEF - KCE | 89% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| STEP - KCE | 86% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| MC - KCE | 86% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||