DFS
Price
$192.03
Change
+$2.87 (+1.52%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
32.42B
68 days until earnings call
QD
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.04 (-1.37%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
562.25M
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DFS vs QD

Header iconDFS vs QD Comparison
Open Charts DFS vs QDBanner chart's image
Discover Financial Services
Price$192.03
Change+$2.87 (+1.52%)
Volume$2.27M
Capitalization32.42B
Qudian
Price$2.90
Change-$0.04 (-1.37%)
Volume$12.24K
Capitalization562.25M
DFS vs QD Comparison Chart
Loading...
DFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DFS vs. QD commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFS is a StrongBuy and QD is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (DFS: $192.03 vs. QD: $2.93)
Brand notoriety: DFS and QD are both notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DFS: 90% vs. QD: 94%
Market capitalization -- DFS: $32.42B vs. QD: $562.25M
DFS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $32.42B. QD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $562.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DFS is a better buy in the long-term than QD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DFS is a better buy in the short-term than QD.

Price Growth

DFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.19% price change this week, while QD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +7.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

DFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

QD is expected to report earnings on Jun 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.21% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFS($32.4B) has a higher market cap than QD($562M). QD has higher P/E ratio than DFS: QD (19.77) vs DFS (11.49). DFS YTD gains are higher at: 11.236 vs. QD (3.901). QD has more cash in the bank: 8.79B vs. DFS (794M). QD has less debt than DFS: QD (9.37M) vs DFS (21.3B). DFS has higher revenues than QD: DFS (15.9B) vs QD (398M).
DFSQDDFS / QD
Capitalization32.4B562M5,765%
EBITDAN/A-339.48M-
Gain YTD11.2363.901288%
P/E Ratio11.4919.7758%
Revenue15.9B398M3,995%
Total Cash794M8.79B9%
Total Debt21.3B9.37M227,346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DFS vs QD: Fundamental Ratings
DFS
QD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
866
SMR RATING
1..100
390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QD's Valuation (68) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as DFS (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that QD’s stock grew similarly to DFS’s over the last 12 months.

DFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (66) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that DFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

DFS's SMR Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for QD (90) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that DFS’s stock grew significantly faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

DFS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as QD (40) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that DFS’s stock grew similarly to QD’s over the last 12 months.

DFS's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as QD (96) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that DFS’s stock grew similarly to QD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFSQD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMJX37.520.02
+0.05%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R6
FCLAX46.83N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
LAVYX14.94N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
GABVX10.40N/A
N/A
Gabelli Value 25 A
WBBIX9.85N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Balanced I

QD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QD has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QD jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QD
1D Price
Change %
QD100%
+2.09%
QFIN - QD
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.05%
LX - QD
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.36%
FINV - QD
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
YRD - QD
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
XYF - QD
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
More