DGRW vs TER
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGRW is a Hold and TER is a Hold.
TER | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DGRW | TER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSUS | 72.72 | 0.08 | +0.11% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF | |||
| SCHJ | 48.18 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| FEEM | 46.28 | N/A | N/A |
| FlexShares ESG & Climate Emerging Markets Core Index Fund | |||
| GTIP | 48.45 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF | |||
| ITAN | 28.52 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | |||
DGRW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGRW has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DGRW jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRW | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| SEIC - DGRW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| TROW - DGRW | 70% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| TER - DGRW | 68% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| MCO - DGRW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| BCPC - DGRW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
TER and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TER has been closely correlated with NXPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TER jumps, then NXPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TER | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TER | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| NXPI - TER | 76% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| TXN - TER | 76% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| STM - TER | 74% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| MCHP - TER | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - TER | 73% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||