It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DHCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFGCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DHCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
DHCC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -21.43% price change this week, while FGCO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.
DHCC is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.
FGCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2022.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
DHCC | FGCO | DHCC / FGCO | |
Capitalization | 12.7M | 28.6M | 44% |
EBITDA | -889.06K | 16.5K | -5,388% |
Gain YTD | -47.569 | 200.000 | -24% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 5.96M | - |
Total Cash | 15.1K | 108K | 14% |
Total Debt | 5.18M | 270K | 1,917% |
DHCC | FGCO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FGCO's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as DHCC (100). This means that FGCO’s stock grew similarly to DHCC’s over the last 12 months.
DHCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as FGCO (100). This means that DHCC’s stock grew similarly to FGCO’s over the last 12 months.
FGCO's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as DHCC (97). This means that FGCO’s stock grew similarly to DHCC’s over the last 12 months.
FGCO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DHCC (95). This means that FGCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than DHCC’s over the last 12 months.
DHCC's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FGCO (100). This means that DHCC’s stock grew similarly to FGCO’s over the last 12 months.
DHCC | FGCO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago69% | 5 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 7 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DHCC and GODNU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DHCC and GODNU's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DHCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DHCC | 100% | +10.00% | ||
GODNU - DHCC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WAVS - DHCC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FGCO - DHCC | 13% Poorly correlated | +7.14% | ||
ETER - DHCC | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BCII - DHCC | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.65% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGCO and GLAC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGCO and GLAC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FGCO | 100% | +7.14% | ||
GLAC - FGCO | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DHCC - FGCO | 13% Poorly correlated | +10.00% | ||
ETER - FGCO | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GRGCF - FGCO | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ILXP - FGCO | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |