Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DHLSX vs MFADX
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison
Open Charts DHLSX vs MFADX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$28.72
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$23.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.71M
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLSX vs. MFADX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLSX is a Buy and MFADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. MFADX (87.7M). DHLSX pays higher dividends than MFADX: DHLSX (2.15) vs MFADX (0.92). DHLSX was incepted earlier than MFADX: DHLSX (20 years) vs MFADX (13 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLSX: MFADX (2000) vs DHLSX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. DHLSX (-0.22). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. DHLSX (23.48).
| DHLSX | MFADX | DHLSX / MFADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.16 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.34 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.969 | 4.384 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 87.7M | 2,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.92 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.22 | 8.63 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.38 | 9.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.48 | 44.32 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.55 | 51.13 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers