Ad is loading...
DHLSX vs MFADX
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison
Open Charts DHLSX vs MFADX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$27.36
Change-$0.69 (-2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$21.55
Change-$0.90 (-4.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.17M
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLSX vs. MFADX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLSX is a Hold and MFADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. MFADX (86.2M). DHLSX pays higher dividends than MFADX: DHLSX (2.21) vs MFADX (0.96). DHLSX was incepted earlier than MFADX: DHLSX (20 years) vs MFADX (13 years). MFADX (2.20) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). DHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MFADX (30.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLSX: MFADX (2000) vs DHLSX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.18 vs. DHLSX (-2.71). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 70.34 vs. DHLSX (50.21).
| DHLSX | MFADX | DHLSX / MFADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.98 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.20 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.353 | -0.576 | -582% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 86.2M | 2,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 0.96 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.71 | -1.18 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.83 | 1.22 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.21 | 70.34 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.17 | 42.98 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...