Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DHLSX vs MFADX
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison
Open Charts DHLSX vs MFADX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$29.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$24.89
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.64M
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLSX vs. MFADX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLSX is a StrongBuy and MFADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. MFADX (88.6M). DHLSX pays higher dividends than MFADX: DHLSX (2.08) vs MFADX (0.86). DHLSX was incepted earlier than MFADX: DHLSX (21 years) vs MFADX (13 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLSX: MFADX (2000) vs DHLSX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.15 vs. DHLSX (5.05). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 42.39 vs. DHLSX (28.90).
| DHLSX | MFADX | DHLSX / MFADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.16 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.34 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.733 | 10.629 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 88.6M | 2,192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 0.86 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.05 | 19.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.39 | 27.64 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.90 | 42.39 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.51 | 68.76 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement