Ad is loading...
DHLSX vs MFADX
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison
Open Charts DHLSX vs MFADX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$28.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$23.39
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.22M
DHLSX vs MFADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLSX vs. MFADX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLSX is a Buy and MFADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. MFADX (93.2M). MFADX (2.05) and DHLSX (2.02) have matching dividends . DHLSX was incepted earlier than MFADX: DHLSX (20 years) vs MFADX (12 years). DHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. MFADX (30.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLSX: MFADX (2000) vs DHLSX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. DHLSX (4.68). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 48.46 vs. DHLSX (15.22).
| DHLSX | MFADX | DHLSX / MFADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.127 | 3.233 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 93.2M | 1,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 2.05 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 9.79 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.80 | 12.47 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.22 | 48.46 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.23 | 52.98 | 57% |