DIN
Price
$30.80
Change
+$0.07 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:25 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
471.27M
26 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$81.75
Change
+$0.26 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
333.1M
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

DIN vs NATH

Header iconDIN vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs NATHBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$30.80
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
Volume$500
Capitalization471.27M
Nathan's Famous
Price$81.75
Change+$0.26 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization333.1M
DIN vs NATH Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. NATH commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a StrongBuy and NATH is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $30.73 vs. NATH: $81.49)
Brand notoriety: DIN and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 84% vs. NATH: 45%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $471.27M vs. NATH: $333.1M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $471.27M. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $333.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.00% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($471M) has a higher market cap than NATH($333M). NATH has higher P/E ratio than DIN: NATH (15.26) vs DIN (5.11). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 3.664 vs. DIN (2.093). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. NATH (36.6M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. NATH (31.2M). NATH has less debt than DIN: NATH (65.6M) vs DIN (1.59B). DIN has higher revenues than NATH: DIN (814M) vs NATH (144M).
DINNATHDIN / NATH
Capitalization471M333M141%
EBITDA219M36.6M598%
Gain YTD2.0933.66457%
P/E Ratio5.1115.2634%
Revenue814M144M565%
Total Cash170M31.2M545%
Total Debt1.59B65.6M2,418%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs NATH: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
10040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9361
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (7) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (26). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (58). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (93). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSVCX11.00N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value C
TMFCX21.98N/A
N/A
Touchstone Mid Cap Value C
SEEFX19.69N/A
N/A
Saturna Sustainable Equity
FGHMX113.22N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesC
UCNQX51.07N/A
N/A
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index C

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-0.07%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
PBPB - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
LOCO - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
KRUS - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
RICK - NATH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More