Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DLA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePVH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PVH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
DLA (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +5.81% price change this week, while PVH (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.
DLA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
PVH is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2024.
Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
DLA | PVH | DLA / PVH | |
Capitalization | 21M | 8.39B | 0% |
EBITDA | -16.83M | 1.18B | -1% |
Gain YTD | -64.236 | -9.441 | 680% |
P/E Ratio | 5.93 | 16.63 | 36% |
Revenue | 388M | 9.22B | 4% |
Total Cash | 377K | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 203M | 3.66B | 6% |
DLA | PVH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 16 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PVH's Valuation (58) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as DLA (68). This means that PVH’s stock grew similarly to DLA’s over the last 12 months.
PVH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as DLA (100). This means that PVH’s stock grew similarly to DLA’s over the last 12 months.
PVH's SMR Rating (69) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as DLA (95). This means that PVH’s stock grew similarly to DLA’s over the last 12 months.
PVH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DLA (96). This means that PVH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DLA’s over the last 12 months.
DLA's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as PVH (95). This means that DLA’s stock grew similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
PVH | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IWC | 115.19 | 1.65 | +1.45% |
iShares Micro-Cap ETF | |||
SSLY | 43.30 | 0.54 | +1.27% |
Syntax Stratified SmallCap ETF | |||
FXA | 64.99 | 0.63 | +0.97% |
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
VMBS | 44.51 | 0.21 | +0.47% |
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Secs ETF | |||
IBTK | 18.98 | 0.08 | +0.42% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Trsry ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DLA and RL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLA and RL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DLA | 100% | +5.37% | ||
RL - DLA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
UAA - DLA | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
SHOO - DLA | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
FIGS - DLA | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
PVH - DLA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
More |