Ad is loading...
DLDCX vs FFGTX
DLDCX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts DLDCX vs FFGTX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources C
Price$32.88
Change-$3.25 (-9.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.00
Change-$0.76 (-4.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
DLDCX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLDCX vs. FFGTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLDCX is a Hold and FFGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLDCX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FFGTX (876M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than DLDCX: FFGTX (1.87) vs DLDCX (0.55). DLDCX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: DLDCX (21 years) vs FFGTX (16 years). DLDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). DLDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.94 vs. FFGTX (49.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLDCX: FFGTX (0) vs DLDCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.26 vs. DLDCX (-19.03). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 141.88 vs. DLDCX (115.82).
| DLDCX | FFGTX | DLDCX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.40 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.40 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.137 | 4.513 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 876M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.87 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.03 | 0.26 | -7,406% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.97 | -7.82 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.82 | 141.88 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.01 | 67.17 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers