DLS | ISVL | DLS / ISVL | |
Gain YTD | 5.956 | 7.811 | 76% |
Net Assets | 949M | 192M | 494% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 51.00 | 18.00 | 283% |
Yield | 3.94 | 3.69 | 107% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
DLS | ISVL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago78% | 26 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and CELC have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and CELC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ISVL | 100% | -0.77% | ||
CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +4.20% | ||
CE - ISVL | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.58% | ||
IDR - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
CARM - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
MOVE - ISVL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
More |