Ad is loading...
DMAT vs GNR
DMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs GNR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$12.52
Change-$0.52 (-3.99%)
Volume$8.37K
CapitalizationN/A
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.48
Change-$0.96 (-1.76%)
Volume$88.36K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
DMAT vs. GNR commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Sell and GNR is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.08B vs. DMAT (4.7M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than DMAT: GNR (-2.285) vs DMAT (-14.913). DMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: DMAT (3 years) vs GNR (14 years). DMAT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| DMAT | GNR | DMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | -14.913 | -2.285 | 653% |
| Net Assets | 4.7M | 3.08B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 36.55 | 15.00 | 244% |
| Yield | 1.88 | 3.30 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| FCX - GNR | 78% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| BHP - GNR | 71% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| SCCO - GNR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||