Ad is loading...
DMFFX vs RLVSX
DMFFX vs RLVSX Comparison
Open Charts DMFFX vs RLVSX
Destinations Municipal Fixed Income I
Price$9.34
Change-$0.08 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets701.05M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.19
Change-$0.27 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.74B
DMFFX vs RLVSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMFFX vs. RLVSX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMFFX is a Hold and RLVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLVSX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. DMFFX (701M). RLVSX pays higher dividends than DMFFX: RLVSX (3.55) vs DMFFX (3.04). DMFFX was incepted earlier than RLVSX: DMFFX (8 years) vs RLVSX (40 years). DMFFX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). DMFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLVSX (39.00). DMFFX (0) and RLVSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.47 vs. DMFFX (0.27). DMFFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.40 vs. RLVSX (-0.46).
| DMFFX | RLVSX | DMFFX / RLVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.51 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.57 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.134 | -1.792 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 701M | 5.74B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.55 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 0.47 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.20 | 2.71 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.40 | -0.46 | -304% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...