Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMFFX vs RLVSX
DMFFX vs RLVSX Comparison
Open Charts DMFFX vs RLVSX
Destinations Municipal Fixed Income I
Price$9.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.19M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.86B
DMFFX vs RLVSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMFFX vs. RLVSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMFFX is a Hold and RLVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLVSX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. DMFFX (651M). RLVSX pays higher dividends than DMFFX: RLVSX (3.65) vs DMFFX (3.08). DMFFX was incepted earlier than RLVSX: DMFFX (8 years) vs RLVSX (40 years). DMFFX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). DMFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RLVSX (39.00). DMFFX (0) and RLVSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. DMFFX (0.94). DMFFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.86 vs. RLVSX (-0.51).
| DMFFX | RLVSX | DMFFX / RLVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.51 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.57 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.457 | -0.002 | 21,488% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 651M | 5.86B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 3.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.94 | 1.28 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.48 | 7.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.86 | -0.51 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers