Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMNIX vs NTCCX
DMNIX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts DMNIX vs NTCCX
Macquarie Tax-Free MN Institutional
Price$10.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets526.63M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
DMNIX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMNIX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMNIX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. DMNIX (527M). DMNIX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: DMNIX (3.85) vs NTCCX (2.77). DMNIX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: DMNIX (12 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than DMNIX (0.72). DMNIX (27.00) and NTCCX (26.00) have comparable annual turnover. DMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: DMNIX (0) vs NTCCX (2500). NTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.51 vs. DMNIX (-0.73). DMNIX return over 5 years is better than : -2.15 vs. NTCCX (-3.24).
| DMNIX | NTCCX | DMNIX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.59 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.090 | -1.646 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 646M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 2.77 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.73 | -0.51 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | 3.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.15 | -3.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.73 | 10.74 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement