Ad is loading...
DMNIX vs NTCCX
DMNIX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts DMNIX vs NTCCX
Macquarie Tax-Free MN Institutional
Price$10.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets536.14M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
DMNIX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMNIX vs. NTCCX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMNIX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. DMNIX (536M). DMNIX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: DMNIX (3.79) vs NTCCX (2.75). DMNIX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: DMNIX (11 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than DMNIX (0.72). DMNIX (27.00) and NTCCX (26.00) have comparable annual turnover. DMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: DMNIX (0) vs NTCCX (2500). DMNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.03 vs. NTCCX (-0.05). DMNIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.16 vs. NTCCX (-0.80).
| DMNIX | NTCCX | DMNIX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.59 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.375 | -1.817 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 536M | 653M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 2.75 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.03 | -0.05 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.44 | 4.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.16 | -0.80 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.15 | 10.34 | 88% |