DNGDF
Price
$3.31
Change
-$0.01 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
87.94M
46 days until earnings call
MAG
Price
$21.61
Change
+$0.24 (+1.12%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNGDF vs MAG

Header iconDNGDF vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts DNGDF vs MAGBanner chart's image
Dynacor Group
Price$3.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.30%)
Volume$4.62K
Capitalization87.94M
MAG Silver
Price$21.61
Change+$0.24 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization1.12B
DNGDF vs MAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNGDF vs. MAG commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNGDF is a Hold and MAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DNGDF: $3.31 vs. MAG: $21.37)
Brand notoriety: DNGDF and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNGDF: 53% vs. MAG: 61%
Market capitalization -- DNGDF: $87.94M vs. MAG: $1.12B
DNGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $87.94M. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DNGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than DNGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNGDF is a better buy in the short-term than MAG.

Price Growth

DNGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

DNGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.74% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than DNGDF($87.9M). MAG has higher P/E ratio than DNGDF: MAG (22.98) vs DNGDF (8.18). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 60.809 vs. DNGDF (-15.345). DNGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.9M vs. MAG (-13.89M). MAG has more cash in the bank: 68.7M vs. DNGDF (30.2M). MAG has less debt than DNGDF: MAG (154K) vs DNGDF (688K). DNGDF has higher revenues than MAG: DNGDF (204M) vs MAG (0).
DNGDFMAGDNGDF / MAG
Capitalization87.9M1.12B8%
EBITDA21.9M-13.89M-158%
Gain YTD-15.34560.809-25%
P/E Ratio8.1822.9836%
Revenue204M0-
Total Cash30.2M68.7M44%
Total Debt688K154K447%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNGDF vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
DNGDF
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5377
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3356
SMR RATING
1..100
5350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7939
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNGDF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAG (78) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DNGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

DNGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as MAG (56) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DNGDF’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as DNGDF (53) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to DNGDF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as DNGDF (62) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to DNGDF’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNGDF (79) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNGDFMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DASTY36.530.22
+0.61%
Dassault Systemes SA
CDPYF32.770.01
+0.03%
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
NRRWF0.05N/A
N/A
Nuran Wireless Inc
CPKF20.80N/A
N/A
Chesapeake Financial Shares, Inc.
ORGJF53.03N/A
N/A
Organo Corp.

DNGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNGDF and NFGC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNGDF and NFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNGDF
1D Price
Change %
DNGDF100%
-0.30%
NFGC - DNGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
BONXF - DNGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.83%
GORO - DNGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.38%
MAG - DNGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
WPM - DNGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More