Ad is loading...
DNLDX vs FSMDX
DNLDX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DNLDX vs FSMDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap A
Price$54.07
Change+$4.37 (+8.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.61M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.20
Change+$2.50 (+8.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
DNLDX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLDX vs. FSMDX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLDX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. DNLDX (385M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DNLDX: FSMDX (1.20) vs DNLDX (0.57). DNLDX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DNLDX (40 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DNLDX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DNLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.46 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNLDX: FSMDX (0) vs DNLDX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.80 vs. DNLDX (-17.99). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. DNLDX (19.32).
| DNLDX | FSMDX | DNLDX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.03 | 4,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 4,600% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.461 | -15.013 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 385M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.99 | -9.80 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.17 | 0.43 | -2,797% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 61.73 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.75 | 71.81 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers