Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNYYX vs PBFCX
DNYYX vs PBFCX Comparison
Open Charts DNYYX vs PBFCX
BNY Mellon NY AMT-Free Municipal Bond Y
Price$13.10
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets847.45M
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets854.61M
DNYYX vs PBFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNYYX vs. PBFCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNYYX is a Hold and PBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX (855M) and DNYYX (847M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . DNYYX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: DNYYX (3.17) vs PBFCX (2.58). DNYYX was incepted earlier than PBFCX: DNYYX (12 years) vs PBFCX (16 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than DNYYX (0.49). DNYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.61 vs. PBFCX (14.00). PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNYYX: PBFCX (1000) vs DNYYX (1000000). DNYYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.11 vs. PBFCX (-2.52). DNYYX return over 5 years is better than : -1.29 vs. PBFCX (-4.41).
| DNYYX | PBFCX | DNYYX / PBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.52 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.52 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.832 | -2.019 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 847M | 855M | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 2.58 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | -2.52 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.57 | 2.29 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.29 | -4.41 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.35 | 9.78 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement