Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNYYX vs PBFCX
DNYYX vs PBFCX Comparison
Open Charts DNYYX vs PBFCX
BNY Mellon NY AMT-Free Municipal Bond Y
Price$13.13
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets860.12M
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets875.98M
DNYYX vs PBFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNYYX vs. PBFCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNYYX is a Hold and PBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX (876M) and DNYYX (860M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . DNYYX pays higher dividends than PBFCX: DNYYX (3.10) vs PBFCX (2.55). DNYYX was incepted earlier than PBFCX: DNYYX (12 years) vs PBFCX (16 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than DNYYX (0.49). DNYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.61 vs. PBFCX (18.00). PBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNYYX: PBFCX (1000) vs DNYYX (1000000). DNYYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. PBFCX (-0.62). DNYYX return over 5 years is better than : 1.62 vs. PBFCX (-1.79).
| DNYYX | PBFCX | DNYYX / PBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.52 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.52 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.525 | -2.657 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 860M | 876M | 98% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.55 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -0.62 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.01 | 3.84 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.62 | -1.79 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.20 | 9.06 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers