DOLLF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.04 (-5.97%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MJGCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

DOLLF vs MJGCF

Header iconDOLLF vs MJGCF Comparison
Open Charts DOLLF vs MJGCFBanner chart's image
Dolly Varden Silver
Price$0.63
Change-$0.04 (-5.97%)
Volume$323.19K
CapitalizationN/A
Majestic Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
DOLLF vs MJGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DOLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOLLF vs. MJGCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOLLF is a Sell and MJGCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DOLLF: $0.63 vs. MJGCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: DOLLF and MJGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOLLF: 75% vs. MJGCF: 22%
Market capitalization -- DOLLF: $144.08M vs. MJGCF: $70.79M
DOLLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $144.08M. MJGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $70.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMJGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DOLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MJGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOLLF is a better buy in the long-term than MJGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOLLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOLLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MJGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DOLLF is a better buy in the short-term than MJGCF.

Price Growth

DOLLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.25% price change this week, while MJGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -16.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOLLF($144M) has a higher market cap than MJGCF($70.8M). DOLLF YTD gains are higher at: -3.221 vs. MJGCF (-13.122). MJGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. DOLLF (-22.19M). MJGCF has more cash in the bank: 58.2M vs. DOLLF (26.7M). DOLLF has less debt than MJGCF: DOLLF (2.07M) vs MJGCF (4.44M). MJGCF has higher revenues than DOLLF: MJGCF (60.1M) vs DOLLF (0).
DOLLFMJGCFDOLLF / MJGCF
Capitalization144M70.8M203%
EBITDA-22.19M31.9M-70%
Gain YTD-3.221-13.12225%
P/E RatioN/A25.58-
Revenue060.1M-
Total Cash26.7M58.2M46%
Total Debt2.07M4.44M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOLLF vs MJGCF: Fundamental Ratings
DOLLF
MJGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5095
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4267
SMR RATING
1..100
9675
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DOLLF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (58). This means that DOLLF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

DOLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (67). This means that DOLLF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as DOLLF (96). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew similarly to DOLLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DOLLF (64). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew similarly to DOLLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as DOLLF (100). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew similarly to DOLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOLLFMJGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DOLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDR31.030.03
+0.10%
Endeavor Group Holdings
PEP154.43-1.71
-1.10%
PepsiCo
VUZI3.75-0.09
-2.34%
Vuzix Corp
NMRK13.20-0.92
-6.52%
Newmark Group
CDXS5.19-0.44
-7.82%
Codexis

DOLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOLLF has been loosely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DOLLF jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOLLF
1D Price
Change %
DOLLF100%
-5.19%
AG - DOLLF
58%
Loosely correlated
-6.30%
PAAS - DOLLF
58%
Loosely correlated
-6.14%
HL - DOLLF
55%
Loosely correlated
-6.00%
AEM - DOLLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
GOLD - DOLLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.50%
More

MJGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MJGCF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MJGCF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJGCF
1D Price
Change %
MJGCF100%
N/A
PMDRF - MJGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMRFF - MJGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOLLF - MJGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
VIORF - MJGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
MMRGF - MJGCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
More