Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRCAX vs FCAVX
DRCAX vs FCAVX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FCAVX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.74M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income Adv
Price$6.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.35B
DRCAX vs FCAVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FCAVX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FCAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAVX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. DRCAX (526M). FCAVX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FCAVX (3.83) vs DRCAX (2.85). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FCAVX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FCAVX (24 years). DRCAX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FCAVX (0.52). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FCAVX (7.96). FCAVX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRCAX: FCAVX (0) vs DRCAX (1000). DRCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.38 vs. FCAVX (0.26). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.73 vs. FCAVX (-3.16).
| DRCAX | FCAVX | DRCAX / FCAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.52 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.52 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.415 | -2.900 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 12.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 3.83 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 0.26 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.94 | 3.96 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.73 | -3.16 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.13 | 2.19 | 691% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement