Ad is loading...
DRCAX vs FCAVX
DRCAX vs FCAVX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FCAVX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.14M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income Adv
Price$6.58
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
DRCAX vs FCAVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FCAVX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FCAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAVX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. DRCAX (531M). FCAVX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FCAVX (3.77) vs DRCAX (2.80). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FCAVX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FCAVX (24 years). DRCAX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FCAVX (0.52). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FCAVX (14.01). FCAVX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRCAX: FCAVX (0) vs DRCAX (1000). FCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.31 vs. DRCAX (1.12). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.01 vs. FCAVX (0.16).
| DRCAX | FCAVX | DRCAX / FCAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.52 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.52 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.129 | -2.624 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 12.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | 1.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.99 | 3.50 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | 0.16 | 2,494% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | 1.93 | 761% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...