Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRCAX vs FKTFX
DRCAX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FKTFX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.74M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.35B
DRCAX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FKTFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. DRCAX (526M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FKTFX (3.72) vs DRCAX (2.85). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FKTFX (48 years). DRCAX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FKTFX (7.96). DRCAX (1000) and FKTFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DRCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.38 vs. FKTFX (0.01). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.73 vs. FKTFX (-3.60).
| DRCAX | FKTFX | DRCAX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.415 | -2.928 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 12.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 3.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 0.01 | 2,541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.94 | 3.71 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.73 | -3.60 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.13 | 1.62 | 931% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement