Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRCAX vs FKTFX
DRCAX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FKTFX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.10
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.52M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
DRCAX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FKTFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. DRCAX (525M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FKTFX (3.76) vs DRCAX (2.89). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FKTFX (48 years). DRCAX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FKTFX (7.96). DRCAX (1000) and FKTFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DRCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.49 vs. FKTFX (-1.13). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.13 vs. FKTFX (-3.87).
| DRCAX | FKTFX | DRCAX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.857 | -2.300 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 12.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | -1.13 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.99 | 6.09 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.13 | -3.87 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.69 | 2.70 | 582% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement