Ad is loading...
DRCAX vs FKTFX
DRCAX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FKTFX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.14M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
DRCAX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FKTFX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. DRCAX (531M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FKTFX (3.67) vs DRCAX (2.80). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FKTFX (48 years). DRCAX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FKTFX (14.01). DRCAX (1000) and FKTFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.21 vs. DRCAX (1.12). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.01 vs. FKTFX (-0.16).
| DRCAX | FKTFX | DRCAX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.129 | -2.644 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 12.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.67 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | 1.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.99 | 3.26 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | -0.16 | -2,512% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | 1.51 | 973% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...