Ad is loading...
DRCAX vs FTFQX
DRCAX vs FTFQX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FTFQX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.14M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
DRCAX vs FTFQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FTFQX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FTFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. DRCAX (531M). FTFQX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FTFQX (3.50) vs DRCAX (2.80). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FTFQX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FTFQX (7 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DRCAX (0.69). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FTFQX (14.01). DRCAX (1000) and FTFQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DRCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. FTFQX (1.05). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.01 vs. FTFQX (-0.65).
| DRCAX | FTFQX | DRCAX / FTFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.129 | -2.676 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 12.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.50 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | 1.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.99 | 2.91 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | -0.65 | -613% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...