Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRCAX vs FTFQX
DRCAX vs FTFQX Comparison
Open Charts DRCAX vs FTFQX
BNY Mellon CA AMT-Free Municipal Bond Z
Price$13.10
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.52M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
DRCAX vs FTFQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRCAX vs. FTFQX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRCAX is a Hold and FTFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. DRCAX (525M). FTFQX pays higher dividends than DRCAX: FTFQX (3.59) vs DRCAX (2.89). DRCAX was incepted earlier than FTFQX: DRCAX (42 years) vs FTFQX (7 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DRCAX (0.69). DRCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.54 vs. FTFQX (7.96). DRCAX (1000) and FTFQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DRCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.49 vs. FTFQX (-1.28). DRCAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.13 vs. FTFQX (-4.36).
| DRCAX | FTFQX | DRCAX / FTFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.857 | -2.358 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 12.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.59 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | -1.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.99 | 5.69 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.13 | -4.36 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement