DRUNF
Price
$15.95
Change
-$0.36 (-2.21%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MTSFF
Price
$8.05
Change
-$0.11 (-1.35%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

DRUNF vs MTSFF

Header iconDRUNF vs MTSFF Comparison
Open Charts DRUNF vs MTSFFBanner chart's image
Dream Un
Price$15.95
Change-$0.36 (-2.21%)
Volume$1.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Mitsui Fudosan
Price$8.05
Change-$0.11 (-1.35%)
Volume$10.38K
CapitalizationN/A
DRUNF vs MTSFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DRUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DRUNF vs. MTSFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRUNF is a Hold and MTSFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DRUNF: $15.95 vs. MTSFF: $8.05)
Brand notoriety: DRUNF and MTSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRUNF: 26% vs. MTSFF: 319%
Market capitalization -- DRUNF: $734.99M vs. MTSFF: $19.35B
DRUNF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $734.99M. MTSFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $19.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRUNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DRUNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRUNF is a better buy in the long-term than MTSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DRUNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTSFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DRUNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTSFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTSFF is a better buy in the short-term than DRUNF.

Price Growth

DRUNF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -8.12% price change this week, while MTSFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-3.02% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTSFF($19.4B) has a higher market cap than DRUNF($735M). MTSFF has higher P/E ratio than DRUNF: MTSFF (13.79) vs DRUNF (5.29). MTSFF YTD gains are higher at: 1.899 vs. DRUNF (-10.269). MTSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 352B vs. DRUNF (318M). MTSFF has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. DRUNF (97.1M). DRUNF has less debt than MTSFF: DRUNF (1.53B) vs MTSFF (4.28T). MTSFF has higher revenues than DRUNF: MTSFF (2.26T) vs DRUNF (317M).
DRUNFMTSFFDRUNF / MTSFF
Capitalization735M19.4B4%
EBITDA318M352B0%
Gain YTD-10.2691.899-541%
P/E Ratio5.2913.7938%
Revenue317M2.26T0%
Total Cash97.1M170B0%
Total Debt1.53B4.28T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DRUNF vs MTSFF: Fundamental Ratings
DRUNF
MTSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9272
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DRUNF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSFF (87). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

DRUNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (100). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

DRUNF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (100). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

DRUNF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (62). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTSFF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as DRUNF (92). This means that MTSFF’s stock grew similarly to DRUNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRUNFMTSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DRUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSGRX47.01N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A
MCDCX19.27-0.03
-0.16%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
VIGAX219.73-0.59
-0.27%
Vanguard Growth Index Admiral
IVEIX9.46-0.05
-0.53%
Delaware Climate Solutions I
SMXAX20.66-0.24
-1.15%
SEI Extended Market Index A (SIIT)

DRUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRUNF has been loosely correlated with HHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DRUNF jumps, then HHH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRUNF
1D Price
Change %
DRUNF100%
-2.23%
HHH - DRUNF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
RMR - DRUNF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
JLL - DRUNF
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CBRE - DRUNF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
JOE - DRUNF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
More

MTSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSFF has been loosely correlated with MITEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTSFF jumps, then MITEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTSFF
1D Price
Change %
MTSFF100%
N/A
MITEF - MTSFF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTSFY - MTSFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
DRUNF - MTSFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
SURDF - MTSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - MTSFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More