Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DSCVX vs FTHFX
DSCVX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts DSCVX vs FTHFX
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap I
Price$31.49
Change+$0.22 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.13M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.71B
DSCVX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DSCVX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DSCVX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. DSCVX (219M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than DSCVX: FTHFX (0.74) vs DSCVX (0.48). DSCVX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: DSCVX (32 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). DSCVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). DSCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.03 vs. FTHFX (41.00). DSCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: DSCVX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). DSCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. FTHFX (4.89). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.93 vs. DSCVX (19.01).
| DSCVX | FTHFX | DSCVX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.63 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.63 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.573 | 4.535 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219M | 10.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.74 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.25 | 4.89 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.22 | 41.50 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.01 | 86.93 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.13 | 151.47 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers