Ad is loading...
DTCCX vs FXAIX
DTCCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DTCCX vs FXAIX
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity C
Price$12.70
Change+$0.22 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.65M
DTCCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTCCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTCCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. DTCCX (406M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DTCCX: FXAIX (1.30) vs DTCCX (0.00). DTCCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DTCCX (26 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DTCCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.51 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTCCX: FXAIX (0) vs DTCCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.67 vs. DTCCX (-8.05). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 101.19 vs. DTCCX (22.01).
| DTCCX | FXAIX | DTCCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.01 | 11,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.01 | 12,467% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.482 | -9.758 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.05 | 5.67 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.25 | 29.58 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.01 | 101.19 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.37 | 173.23 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...