Ad is loading...
DTCCX vs FXAIX
DTCCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DTCCX vs FXAIX
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity C
Price$14.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.34M
DTCCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTCCX vs. FXAIX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTCCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. DTCCX (456M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DTCCX: FXAIX (1.34) vs DTCCX (0.00). DTCCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DTCCX (26 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DTCCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.51 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTCCX: FXAIX (0) vs DTCCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.41 vs. DTCCX (0.14). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 120.95 vs. DTCCX (35.81).
| DTCCX | FXAIX | DTCCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.01 | 11,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.01 | 12,467% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.543 | -0.207 | 745% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 594B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 13.41 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.24 | 51.96 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.81 | 120.95 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.88 | 200.95 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...