Ad is loading...
DTLGX vs GFACX
DTLGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs GFACX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$40.35
Change+$0.34 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.82M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
DTLGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. GFACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. DTLGX (245M). DTLGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . DTLGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DTLGX (33 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) and DTLGX (1.33) have similar cost to investors . DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: GFACX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. DTLGX (-0.17). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. DTLGX (0.21).
| DTLGX | GFACX | DTLGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.36 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.36 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.969 | -2.682 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.17 | 1.60 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 28.28 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.21 | 34.66 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.84 | 45.25 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...