Ad is loading...
DTLGX vs RGACX
DTLGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs RGACX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$40.35
Change+$0.34 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.82M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
DTLGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. DTLGX (245M). RGACX pays higher dividends than DTLGX: RGACX (0.08) vs DTLGX (0.00). DTLGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: DTLGX (33 years) vs RGACX (23 years). DTLGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: RGACX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. DTLGX (-0.17). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. DTLGX (0.21).
| DTLGX | RGACX | DTLGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.94 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.94 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.969 | -2.542 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.17 | 3.09 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 32.79 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.21 | 42.06 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.84 | 58.28 | -1% |