Ad is loading...
DTMGX vs GFAFX
DTMGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts DTMGX vs GFAFX
BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth A
Price$36.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.66M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
DTMGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTMGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTMGX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. DTMGX (129M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than DTMGX: GFAFX (0.33) vs DTMGX (0.20). DTMGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: DTMGX (27 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). DTMGX (1.22) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DTMGX (14.92). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTMGX: GFAFX (250) vs DTMGX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.16 vs. DTMGX (-6.24). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.33 vs. DTMGX (26.72).
| DTMGX | GFAFX | DTMGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.67 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.67 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.655 | -2.928 | -22% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129M | 287B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.33 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.24 | 3.16 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.18 | 22.29 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.72 | 49.33 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.71 | 66.90 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...