Ad is loading...
DTMGX vs RGACX
DTMGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts DTMGX vs RGACX
BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth A
Price$36.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.66M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$69.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
DTMGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTMGX vs. RGACX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTMGX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. DTMGX (129M). DTMGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: DTMGX (0.20) vs RGACX (0.08). DTMGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: DTMGX (27 years) vs RGACX (23 years). DTMGX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DTMGX (14.92). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTMGX: RGACX (250) vs DTMGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.66 vs. DTMGX (-6.24). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.01 vs. DTMGX (26.72).
| DTMGX | RGACX | DTMGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.94 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.94 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.655 | -2.987 | -22% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129M | 287B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.08 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.24 | 2.66 | -234% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.18 | 21.08 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.72 | 47.01 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.71 | 63.74 | 75% |