DUHP vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DUHP is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DUHP | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QCLR | 32.54 | 0.51 | +1.59% |
| Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF | |||
| CLOU | 25.38 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Cloud Computing ETF | |||
| IWFL | 50.09 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Gr Fctr TR ETN | |||
| DVAL | 14.16 | -0.11 | -0.75% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Dyn US Lrg Cap Val ETF | |||
| IYG | 79.04 | -0.68 | -0.85% |
| iShares US Financial Services ETF | |||
DUHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DUHP has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DUHP jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DUHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUHP | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| MCHP - DUHP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| LRCX - DUHP | 69% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| KLAC - DUHP | 69% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| TXN - DUHP | 68% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| NXPI - DUHP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 93% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 92% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| VECO - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| ONTO - KLAC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||