DUO
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.06 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 18, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.71M
LGFRY
Price
$12.54
Change
-$0.18 (-1.42%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DUO vs LGFRY

Header iconDUO vs LGFRY Comparison
Open Charts DUO vs LGFRYBanner chart's image
Fangdd Network Group
Price$2.15
Change+$0.06 (+2.87%)
Volume$2.37K
Capitalization1.71M
Longfor Group Holdings
Price$12.54
Change-$0.18 (-1.42%)
Volume$3.74K
Capitalization16.88B
DUO vs LGFRY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DUO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGFRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DUO vs. LGFRY commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DUO is a Hold and LGFRY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (DUO: $2.09 vs. LGFRY: $12.54)
Brand notoriety: DUO and LGFRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DUO: 217% vs. LGFRY: 87%
Market capitalization -- DUO: $1.71M vs. LGFRY: $16.88B
DUO [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.71M. LGFRY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $16.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DUO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGFRY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DUO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGFRY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGFRY is a better buy in the long-term than DUO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DUO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGFRY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DUO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LGFRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DUO is a better buy in the short-term than LGFRY.

Price Growth

DUO (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -13.64% price change this week, while LGFRY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

DUO is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

LGFRY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.08% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGFRY($16.9B) has a higher market cap than DUO($1.71M). LGFRY YTD gains are higher at: 1.377 vs. DUO (-78.160). LGFRY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.5B vs. DUO (-117.74M). LGFRY has higher revenues than DUO: LGFRY (251B) vs DUO (255M).
DUOLGFRYDUO / LGFRY
Capitalization1.71M16.9B0%
EBITDA-117.74M47.5B-0%
Gain YTD-78.1601.377-5,676%
P/E RatioN/A4.39-
Revenue255M251B0%
Total Cash131MN/A-
Total Debt465KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGFRY: Fundamental Ratings
LGFRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DUOLGFRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DUO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGFRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYU34.241.06
+3.19%
ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing
XLF52.510.50
+0.96%
The Financial Select Sector SPDR® ETF
XYLG27.930.08
+0.29%
Global X S&P 500® Covered Call & Gr ETF
IGLD21.800.06
+0.28%
FT Vest Gold Strategy Trgt Inc ETF
TDTF24.040.03
+0.12%
FlexShares iBoxx 5Yr Target Dur TIPS ETF

DUO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DUO has been loosely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DUO jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DUO
1D Price
Change %
DUO100%
-2.34%
BEKE - DUO
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
LGFRY - DUO
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
XIN - DUO
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.40%
HLPPY - DUO
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
GRNNF - DUO
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LGFRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGFRY has been closely correlated with HLPPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGFRY jumps, then HLPPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGFRY
1D Price
Change %
LGFRY100%
-1.43%
HLPPY - LGFRY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
CAOVY - LGFRY
69%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
BEKE - LGFRY
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
SUHJY - LGFRY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
HLDCY - LGFRY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More