Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAASX vs TRQZX
EAASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$34.92
Change+$0.09 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$102.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.8B
EAASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.8B vs. EAASX (14.5B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than EAASX: TRQZX (0.61) vs EAASX (0.00). EAASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: EAASX (22 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). EAASX (1.12) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EAASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAASX: TRQZX (0) vs EAASX (1000). EAASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.23 vs. TRQZX (-1.10). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : 19.77 vs. TRQZX (9.75).
| EAASX | TRQZX | EAASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.61 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.404 | 2.025 | 20% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 27.8B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | -1.10 | -293% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.53 | 14.91 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.77 | 9.75 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement