Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRIX
EABLX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRIX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. EABLX (4.18B). FFRIX (8.08) and EABLX (7.89) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: EABLX (24 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). EABLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (31.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRIX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. EABLX (5.36). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.69 vs. EABLX (36.18).
| EABLX | FFRIX | EABLX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.77 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.77 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.401 | 0.532 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 14.4B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.89 | 8.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.36 | 6.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.41 | 26.71 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.18 | 42.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.92 | 56.16 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement