Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRIX
EABLX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRIX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. EABLX (4.08B). FFRIX (7.74) and EABLX (7.53) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: EABLX (25 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). EABLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (31.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRIX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. EABLX (5.95). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 38.62 vs. EABLX (31.29).
| EABLX | FFRIX | EABLX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.77 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.77 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.229 | 2.631 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.08B | 15.2B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.53 | 7.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 6.96 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.59 | 25.88 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.29 | 38.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.15 | 61.57 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers