Ad is loading...
EABLX vs FFRIX
EABLX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRIX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. EABLX (4.53B). FFRIX (8.08) and EABLX (7.89) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: EABLX (24 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). EABLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (31.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRIX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRIX (5.22) and EABLX (4.96) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.64 vs. EABLX (37.23).
| EABLX | FFRIX | EABLX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.77 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.77 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.210 | -0.351 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 14.4B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.89 | 8.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 5.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.81 | 21.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 44.64 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.68 | 54.63 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...