Ad is loading...
EACAX vs PCMBX
EACAX vs PCMBX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMBX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.83
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd A
Price$9.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.85M
EACAX vs PCMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMBX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. PCMBX (198M). EACAX pays higher dividends than PCMBX: EACAX (3.36) vs PCMBX (3.11). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMBX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCMBX (26 years). PCMBX (0.78) and EACAX (0.75) have similar cost to investors . EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCMBX (35.00). EACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PCMBX (2%) vs PCMBX (2%). EACAX (1000) and PCMBX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.58 vs. EACAX (1.11). PCMBX return over 5 years is better than : 3.12 vs. EACAX (2.86).
| EACAX | PCMBX | EACAX / PCMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.78 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.78 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.551 | -0.978 | 261% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 144% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 198M | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 1.58 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.91 | 5.97 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | 3.12 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.20 | 12.37 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers