Ad is loading...
EAFAX vs FFRHX
EAFAX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. FFRHX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. EAFAX (5.57B). EAFAX (8.47) and FFRHX (8.13) have matching dividends . EAFAX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: EAFAX (17 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EAFAX (35.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFAX: FFRHX (0) vs EAFAX (1000). FFRHX (5.47) and EAFAX (5.44) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRHX (44.18) and EAFAX (44.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EAFAX | FFRHX | EAFAX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.73 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.73 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.898 | -0.828 | 108% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 16B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.47 | 8.13 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 5.47 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.90 | 21.09 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.15 | 44.18 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.26 | 54.57 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...