Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFAX vs FFRHX
EAFAX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. FFRHX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. EAFAX (5.3B). EAFAX (8.08) and FFRHX (7.78) have matching dividends . EAFAX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: EAFAX (17 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EAFAX (35.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFAX: FFRHX (0) vs EAFAX (1000). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. EAFAX (5.83). FFRHX (39.42) and EAFAX (37.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EAFAX | FFRHX | EAFAX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.73 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.73 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.138 | 2.255 | 95% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 15.1B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.08 | 7.78 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 6.24 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 27.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.83 | 39.42 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.70 | 60.66 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers