Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFAX vs FFRIX
EAFAX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. FFRIX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. EAFAX (5.32B). EAFAX (8.28) and FFRIX (7.94) have matching dividends . EAFAX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: EAFAX (17 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EAFAX (35.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFAX: FFRIX (0) vs EAFAX (1000). FFRIX (6.33) and EAFAX (6.18) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRIX (38.88) and EAFAX (38.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EAFAX | FFRIX | EAFAX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.77 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.77 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.491 | 1.394 | 107% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 5.32B | 14.8B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.28 | 7.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 6.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.87 | 25.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.74 | 38.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.42 | 57.65 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement