Ad is loading...
EAFAX vs FFRIX
EAFAX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. FFRIX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. EAFAX (5.57B). EAFAX (8.47) and FFRIX (8.09) have matching dividends . EAFAX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: EAFAX (17 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EAFAX (35.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFAX: FFRIX (0) vs EAFAX (1000). EAFAX (5.44) and FFRIX (5.43) have marching annual gain over last year. EAFAX (44.15) and FFRIX (43.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EAFAX | FFRIX | EAFAX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.77 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.77 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.898 | -0.841 | 107% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 16B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.47 | 8.09 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 5.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.90 | 20.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.15 | 43.93 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.26 | 53.87 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...