Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFAX vs FFRIX
EAFAX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. FFRIX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. EAFAX (5.3B). EAFAX (8.08) and FFRIX (7.74) have matching dividends . EAFAX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: EAFAX (17 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EAFAX (35.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFAX: FFRIX (0) vs EAFAX (1000). FFRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.20 vs. EAFAX (5.83). FFRIX (39.01) and EAFAX (37.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EAFAX | FFRIX | EAFAX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.77 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.77 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.138 | 2.231 | 96% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 15.1B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.08 | 7.74 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 6.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 27.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.83 | 39.01 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.70 | 59.94 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers