Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFAX vs PFFRX
EAFAX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. PFFRX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAFAX has more cash in the bank: 5.27B vs. PFFRX (4.96B). EAFAX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: EAFAX (8.08) vs PFFRX (7.49). EAFAX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: EAFAX (17 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. EAFAX (35.00). EAFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: EAFAX (1000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. EAFAX (6.40). PFFRX (37.42) and EAFAX (36.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EAFAX | PFFRX | EAFAX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.69 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.69 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.584 | 3.701 | 70% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.27B | 4.96B | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.08 | 7.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.40 | 7.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.08 | 28.46 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 37.42 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.67 | 62.86 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers