Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMEBX
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$19.47
Change-$0.30 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.87M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.50
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. EAFVX (239M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMEBX (1.15) vs EAFVX (1.09). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and EAFVX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. EAFVX (2.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 75.71 vs. EAFVX (69.18).
| EAFVX | RMEBX | EAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.101 | 1.093 | 9% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.15 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | 5.48 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 15.13 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.18 | 75.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.35 | 63.40 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...