Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMEBX
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$20.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.39M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.36
Change+$0.39 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. EAFVX (233M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMEBX (1.54) vs EAFVX (0.82). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMEBX (13.64) and EAFVX (13.26) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. EAFVX (24.18).
| EAFVX | RMEBX | EAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.038 | 4.481 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.54 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 13.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 15.51 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.18 | 44.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.58 | 68.60 | 77% |