Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMFCX
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$19.47
Change-$0.30 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.87M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.21
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. EAFVX (239M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFCX (1.30) vs EAFVX (1.09). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EAFVX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. EAFVX (2.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 77.01 vs. EAFVX (69.18).
| EAFVX | RMFCX | EAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.101 | 1.136 | 9% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.30 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | 5.61 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 15.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.18 | 77.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.35 | 64.83 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...