Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMFCX
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$18.20
Change+$0.19 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. EAFVX (234M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFCX (1.34) vs EAFVX (1.13). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EAFVX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. EAFVX (-8.39). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. EAFVX (35.70).
| EAFVX | RMFCX | EAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.810 | -2.681 | 329% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.34 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.39 | 1.87 | -448% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.69 | 6.27 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.70 | 53.32 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.48 | 54.78 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...