Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMFCX
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$19.18
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EAFVX (220M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFCX (1.37) vs EAFVX (1.18). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EAFVX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. EAFVX (-5.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.82 vs. EAFVX (40.82).
| EAFVX | RMFCX | EAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.886 | 1.050 | -275% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.44 | 4.39 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.63 | 17.27 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.82 | 55.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.11 | 60.49 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...