Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFVX vs RMFCX
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$19.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.47M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. EAFVX (232M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs EAFVX (1.14). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EAFVX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. EAFVX (-3.19). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. EAFVX (28.54).
| EAFVX | RMFCX | EAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.962 | 5.423 | -18% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.19 | 8.44 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.13 | 18.47 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.54 | 50.95 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.36 | 69.73 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement