Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFVX vs RMFCX
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$20.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.29
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
EAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. EAFVX (238M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFCX (1.27) vs EAFVX (1.11). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EAFVX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. EAFVX (-0.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.75 vs. EAFVX (38.80).
| EAFVX | RMFCX | EAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.772 | 9.283 | 19% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.27 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.71 | 7.82 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.43 | 30.38 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.80 | 56.75 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.24 | 75.64 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement