Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMFEX
EAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$19.18
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.61M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
EAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EAFVX (220M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFEX (1.65) vs EAFVX (1.18). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EAFVX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFEX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. EAFVX (-5.44). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.22 vs. EAFVX (40.82).
| EAFVX | RMFEX | EAFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.62 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.886 | 1.154 | -250% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.65 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.44 | 4.72 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.63 | 18.36 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.82 | 58.22 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.11 | 66.67 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...