Ad is loading...
EAFVX vs RMFEX
EAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps A
Price$18.20
Change+$0.19 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
EAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. EAFVX (234M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMFEX (1.61) vs EAFVX (1.13). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EAFVX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EAFVX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMFEX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. EAFVX (-8.39). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. EAFVX (35.70).
| EAFVX | RMFEX | EAFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.62 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.810 | -2.593 | 340% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.61 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.39 | 2.21 | -379% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.69 | 7.26 | -78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.70 | 55.72 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.48 | 60.75 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...