EAT
Price
$135.07
Change
-$3.63 (-2.62%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6B
25 days until earnings call
PBPB
Price
$8.84
Change
-$0.57 (-6.06%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
294.91M
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs PBPB

Header iconEAT vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs PBPBBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$135.07
Change-$3.63 (-2.62%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization6B
Potbelly
Price$8.84
Change-$0.57 (-6.06%)
Volume$15.36K
Capitalization294.91M
EAT vs PBPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. PBPB commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Hold and PBPB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $138.70 vs. PBPB: $9.41)
Brand notoriety: EAT and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 165% vs. PBPB: 129%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $6B vs. PBPB: $294.91M
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $6B. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $294.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $214.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than PBPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -10.16% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was -1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

PBPB is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($6B) has a higher market cap than PBPB($295M). EAT has higher P/E ratio than PBPB: EAT (23.49) vs PBPB (7.19). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 4.845 vs. PBPB (-0.106). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 538M vs. PBPB (21.3M). EAT has more cash in the bank: 14.8M vs. PBPB (11.7M). PBPB has less debt than EAT: PBPB (155M) vs EAT (1.86B). EAT has higher revenues than PBPB: EAT (4.83B) vs PBPB (463M).
EATPBPBEAT / PBPB
Capitalization6B295M2,033%
EBITDA538M21.3M2,526%
Gain YTD4.845-0.106-4,564%
P/E Ratio23.497.19327%
Revenue4.83B463M1,042%
Total Cash14.8M11.7M126%
Total Debt1.86B155M1,197%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1444
SMR RATING
1..100
513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAT's Valuation (84) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (87). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (44). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (13). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PBPB (57). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBND21.930.10
+0.46%
VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF
BSCP20.690.01
+0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corp Bd ETF
VLT10.45-0.17
-1.60%
Invesco High Income Trust II
BAPR41.36-1.43
-3.35%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Apr
MSOX3.20-0.57
-15.12%
AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with RRGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then RRGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
-4.66%
RRGB - PBPB
39%
Loosely correlated
-5.10%
RICK - PBPB
34%
Loosely correlated
-7.01%
BLMN - PBPB
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.80%
EAT - PBPB
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.66%
PTLO - PBPB
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.40%
More