EAT
Price
$155.25
Change
+$4.34 (+2.88%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.89B
26 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$41.88
Change
+$0.31 (+0.75%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.37B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs PZZA

Header iconEAT vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs PZZABanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$155.25
Change+$4.34 (+2.88%)
Volume$1.02M
Capitalization6.89B
Papa John's International
Price$41.88
Change+$0.31 (+0.75%)
Volume$12.98K
Capitalization1.37B
EAT vs PZZA Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. PZZA commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Buy and PZZA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $155.25 vs. PZZA: $41.57)
Brand notoriety: EAT and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 66% vs. PZZA: 55%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $6.89B vs. PZZA: $1.37B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $6.89B. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than PZZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EAT and PZZA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.19% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($6.89B) has a higher market cap than PZZA($1.37B). EAT has higher P/E ratio than PZZA: EAT (27.00) vs PZZA (16.48). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 17.356 vs. PZZA (2.456). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 538M vs. PZZA (226M). PZZA has more cash in the bank: 38M vs. EAT (14.8M). PZZA has less debt than EAT: PZZA (971M) vs EAT (1.86B). EAT has higher revenues than PZZA: EAT (4.83B) vs PZZA (2.06B).
EATPZZAEAT / PZZA
Capitalization6.89B1.37B503%
EBITDA538M226M238%
Gain YTD17.3562.456707%
P/E Ratio27.0016.48164%
Revenue4.83B2.06B234%
Total Cash14.8M38M39%
Total Debt1.86B971M191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1971
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12100
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
989
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PZZA's Valuation (13) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAT (85). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZZA (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (7). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (63). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZZA (89). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGQPX19.36N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P
RECRX11.65N/A
N/A
RBC Emerging Markets Ex-China Equity R6
ISCAX41.53N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co A
FNIAX38.68N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights A
MMUBX22.54N/A
N/A
MFS Utilities B

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
+1.19%
FRSH - PZZA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
EAT - PZZA
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
PTLO - PZZA
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
CBRL - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
WEN - PZZA
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More