Ad is loading...
EAT
Price
$124.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
68 days until earnings call
RRGB
Price
$4.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs RRGB

Header iconEAT vs RRGB Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs RRGBBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$124.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.24M
CapitalizationN/A
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
Price$4.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$229.88K
CapitalizationN/A
EAT vs RRGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. RRGB commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Hold and RRGB is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (EAT: $123.71 vs. RRGB: $4.92)
Brand notoriety: EAT and RRGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 91% vs. RRGB: 52%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $5.54B vs. RRGB: $77.62M
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $5.54B. RRGB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $77.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRRGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RRGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than RRGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRGB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RRGB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than RRGB.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.20% price change this week, while RRGB (@Restaurants) price change was -4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +25.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

RRGB is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.55% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($5.54B) has a higher market cap than RRGB($77.6M). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 186.498 vs. RRGB (-60.545). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 438M vs. RRGB (32.3M). RRGB has more cash in the bank: 22M vs. EAT (16.2M). RRGB has less debt than EAT: RRGB (586M) vs EAT (2.01B). EAT has higher revenues than RRGB: EAT (4.54B) vs RRGB (1.27B).
EATRRGBEAT / RRGB
Capitalization5.54B77.6M7,142%
EBITDA438M32.3M1,356%
Gain YTD186.498-60.545-308%
P/E Ratio30.32N/A-
Revenue4.54B1.27B357%
Total Cash16.2M22M74%
Total Debt2.01B586M343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs RRGB: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
RRGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
196
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RRGB's Valuation (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (97). This means that RRGB’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (99). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (64). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (95). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATRRGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDIV79.670.92
+1.17%
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF
AVMU46.560.12
+0.25%
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Inc ETF
HYRM23.770.01
+0.06%
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF
CSHI49.780.01
+0.02%
NEOS Enhanced Income CA Alt ETF
SPMV46.93N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF