EAT
Price
$183.50
Change
+$1.00 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jan 31, 02:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.99B
89 days until earnings call
RRGB
Price
$6.32
Change
-$0.06 (-0.94%)
Updated
Jan 31, 01:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
107.83M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs RRGB

Header iconEAT vs RRGB Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs RRGBBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$183.50
Change+$1.00 (+0.55%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization7.99B
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
Price$6.32
Change-$0.06 (-0.94%)
Volume$100
Capitalization107.83M
EAT vs RRGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. RRGB commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Buy and RRGB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $182.50 vs. RRGB: $6.38)
Brand notoriety: EAT and RRGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 164% vs. RRGB: 73%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $7.99B vs. RRGB: $107.83M
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.99B. RRGB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $107.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRRGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RRGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than RRGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRGB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RRGB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRGB is a better buy in the short-term than EAT.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +18.11% price change this week, while RRGB (@Restaurants) price change was +8.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

RRGB is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.18% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($7.99B) has a higher market cap than RRGB($108M). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 37.955 vs. RRGB (16.211). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 438M vs. RRGB (32.3M). RRGB has more cash in the bank: 22M vs. EAT (16.2M). RRGB has less debt than EAT: RRGB (586M) vs EAT (2.01B). EAT has higher revenues than RRGB: EAT (4.54B) vs RRGB (1.27B).
EATRRGBEAT / RRGB
Capitalization7.99B108M7,396%
EBITDA438M32.3M1,356%
Gain YTD37.95516.211234%
P/E Ratio31.74N/A-
Revenue4.54B1.27B357%
Total Cash16.2M22M74%
Total Debt2.01B586M343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs RRGB: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
RRGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
8100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
596
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RRGB's Valuation (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (86). This means that RRGB’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (49). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (96). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATRRGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRF12.270.33
+2.79%
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
MAXI31.020.36
+1.17%
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Inc ETF
FTCS91.050.94
+1.04%
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
FCOR46.470.09
+0.20%
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
POCT40.200.03
+0.07%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buf ETF™ Oct