EAT
Price
$159.65
Change
+$2.36 (+1.50%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.09B
One day until earnings call
SVV
Price
$9.40
Change
-$0.23 (-2.39%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EAT vs SVV

Header iconEAT vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs SVVBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$159.65
Change+$2.36 (+1.50%)
Volume$1.33M
Capitalization7.09B
Savers Value Village
Price$9.40
Change-$0.23 (-2.39%)
Volume$828.78K
Capitalization3.12B
EAT vs SVV Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. SVV commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a StrongBuy and SVV is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $159.65 vs. SVV: $9.40)
Brand notoriety: EAT and SVV are both not notable
EAT represents the Restaurants, while SVV is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 89% vs. SVV: 91%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $7.09B vs. SVV: $3.12B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.09B. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.49B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than SVV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than SVV.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.04% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

SVV is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.64% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

@Specialty Stores (+2.68% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($7.09B) has a higher market cap than SVV($3.12B). SVV has higher P/E ratio than EAT: SVV (56.82) vs EAT (27.77). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 20.682 vs. SVV (-8.293). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 538M vs. SVV (202M). SVV has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. EAT (14.8M). SVV has less debt than EAT: SVV (1.29B) vs EAT (1.86B). EAT has higher revenues than SVV: EAT (4.83B) vs SVV (1.5B).
EATSVVEAT / SVV
Capitalization7.09B3.12B227%
EBITDA538M202M266%
Gain YTD20.682-8.293-249%
P/E Ratio27.7756.8249%
Revenue4.83B1.5B322%
Total Cash14.8M180M8%
Total Debt1.86B1.29B144%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKF33.640.24
+0.72%
ProShares UltraShort Financials
BNO27.900.16
+0.58%
United States Brent Oil
JMBS44.840.23
+0.52%
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Sec ETF
IBDY25.440.09
+0.36%
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corp ETF
PHT7.560.01
+0.13%
Pioneer High Income Fund

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
+1.50%
CAKE - EAT
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
DRI - EAT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
TXRH - EAT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
SHAK - EAT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
FRSH - EAT
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.15%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
-2.39%
RH - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
AN - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
GPI - SVV
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
LAD - SVV
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
ABG - SVV
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More