Advertisement
EBAY vs LMFA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBAY is a Hold and LMFA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBAY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLMFA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EBAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- LMFA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMFA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EBAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LMFA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EBAY (@Internet Retail) experienced а +1.80% price change this week, while LMFA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +21.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +113.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
EBAY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
LMFA is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Retail (+2.10% weekly)The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.71% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| EBAY | LMFA | EBAY / LMFA | |
| Capitalization | 36.4B | 8.4M | 433,282% |
| EBITDA | 2.96B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.662 | 120.465 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.00 | 2.05 | 927% |
| Revenue | 10.3B | -5.67M | -181,784% |
| Total Cash | 4.79B | 469K | 1,021,535% |
| Total Debt | 7.18B | 285K | 2,518,596% |
EBAY | LMFA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMFA's Valuation (69) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EBAY (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LMFA’s stock grew similarly to EBAY’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMFA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's SMR Rating (27) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMFA (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew significantly faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as LMFA (35) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew similarly to LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMFA (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew significantly faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
| EBAY | LMFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 83% |
Advertisement
EBAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBAY has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBAY jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBAY | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| CVNA - EBAY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ZLNDY - EBAY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CPNG - EBAY | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CART - EBAY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| TDUP - EBAY | 26% Poorly correlated | +14.32% | ||
More | ||||
LMFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMFA has been loosely correlated with SOFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMFA jumps, then SOFI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMFA | 100% | +46.75% | ||
| SOFI - LMFA | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| URI - LMFA | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.72% | ||
| SYF - LMFA | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| UPST - LMFA | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| GATX - LMFA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||