It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFITBI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBMT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FITBI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.86% price change this week, while FITBI (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.
EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
FITBI is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
EBMT | FITBI | EBMT / FITBI | |
Capitalization | 102M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 16.159 | 2.222 | 727% |
P/E Ratio | 9.90 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 83.3M | 8.54B | 1% |
Total Cash | 19.7M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 235M | 18.9B | 1% |
EBMT | FITBI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FITBI's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (37). This means that FITBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
FITBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (74). This means that FITBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FITBI (100). This means that EBMT’s stock grew significantly faster than FITBI’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITBI (52). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FITBI’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FITBI (100). This means that EBMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FITBI’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT | FITBI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago24% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago19% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago17% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago39% | 1 day ago18% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago15% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago8% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | 24 days ago14% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 4 days ago16% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago51% | 1 day ago17% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago7% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITBI has been loosely correlated with WTFCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FITBI jumps, then WTFCP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FITBI | 100% | N/A | ||
WTFCP - FITBI | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
WSBCP - FITBI | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
OCFCP - FITBI | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
FFWM - FITBI | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
TECTP - FITBI | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More |