Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EBNCX vs MEDBX
EBNCX vs MEDBX Comparison
Open Charts EBNCX vs MEDBX
American Funds Emerging Markets Bd C
Price$7.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.02B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$11.95
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
EBNCX vs MEDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBNCX vs. MEDBX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBNCX is a Hold and MEDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.01B vs. EBNCX (3.02B). MEDBX (5.77) and EBNCX (5.59) have matching dividends . EBNCX was incepted earlier than MEDBX: EBNCX (9 years) vs MEDBX (23 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than EBNCX (1.68). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. EBNCX (43.00). EBNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDBX: EBNCX (250) vs MEDBX (1000). MEDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. EBNCX (2.91). EBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.25 vs. MEDBX (7.87).
| EBNCX | MEDBX | EBNCX / MEDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.81 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.82 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.704 | 1.169 | 402% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 7.01B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.59 | 5.77 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 5.17 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.78 | 16.76 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.25 | 7.87 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.47 | - |